Tournaments

Bob47 · Post by **Bob47** » February 5th, 2006, 20:24

seeing as the C&C ZH one is doing well (i think) so i was wondering is people wanted to do other Tournaments in other games

What are your thoughts

Post by **TezzRexx** » February 5th, 2006, 22:07

pixie pie · Post by **pixie pie** » February 5th, 2006, 22:38

TezzRexx wrote:Yes.

This

Fred Woogle · Post by **Fred Woogle** » February 5th, 2006, 23:08

how about a 2vs2 CS:S?

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » February 5th, 2006, 23:10

DEJECT! i choose you!

Post by **ProfHawking** » February 5th, 2006, 23:16

GUNSLINGER! i choose you!

Post by **Dr. kitteny berk** » February 5th, 2006, 23:19

*submits and prepares for a whupping*

Fred Woogle · Post by **Fred Woogle** » February 5th, 2006, 23:22

I choose a seonc computerr under my control, I get to loose twice

Lateralus · Post by **Lateralus** » February 5th, 2006, 23:43

Ty aka Sir Die Aloty wrote:how about a 2vs2 CS:S?

I mentioned this elsewhere I believe.

I'm game - anyone else fancy losing with me?

Fred Woogle · Post by **Fred Woogle** » February 6th, 2006, 0:07

count me in lat

Post by **Grimmie** » February 6th, 2006, 3:21

I think to be fair, and to make sure no "Super Teams" pair up, it should be a pick of the draw type affair, if we're going to try a 2v2

Post by **deject** » February 6th, 2006, 3:37

count me in, but I am in school so scheduling is key...

mrbobbins · Post by **mrbobbins** » February 6th, 2006, 9:31

Grimmie wrote:I think to be fair, and to make sure no "Super Teams" pair up, it should be a pick of the draw type affair, if we're going to try a 2v2

Er if

this then count me in!!

Lateralus · Post by **Lateralus** » February 6th, 2006, 10:28

mrbobbins wrote:
Grimmie wrote:I think to be fair, and to make sure no "Super Teams" pair up, it should be a pick of the draw type affair, if we're going to try a 2v2
Er if this then count me in!!

Actually,

This.

This is no reflection on anyone other than myself, but not being the greatest player then this sounds like a good plan.

Also, matches don't have to be at the same time every week, they could be scheduled according to when fits for the 4 players involved. Spectators don't matter, so it *should* be easy enough to coordinate.

It looks like we're up to 8 or 9 now which Ain't bad. I'll put a post in the proper forum.

Hehulk · Post by **Hehulk** » February 6th, 2006, 10:35

mrbobbins wrote:
Grimmie wrote:I think to be fair, and to make sure no "Super Teams" pair up, it should be a pick of the draw type affair, if we're going to try a 2v2
Er if this then count me in!!

I would say this

, but being a slacker, I have almost no demands on my time

Lateralus · Post by **Lateralus** » February 6th, 2006, 10:42

Hehulk wrote:
mrbobbins wrote:
Grimmie wrote:I think to be fair, and to make sure no "Super Teams" pair up, it should be a pick of the draw type affair, if we're going to try a 2v2
Er if this then count me in!!
I would say this , but being a slacker, I have almost no demands on my time

*Looks at Hehulk's xFire profile*

Most full-time jobs I know of are 37-39 hours a week. You seem to average over 10 hours a day! Thats what I call demanding!

Tournament details here, sign up now!