Survival of the Dead

For talk on Movies, TV, Music & Books

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Survival of the Dead

Post by Dog Pants »

Survival of the Dead

Synopsis
The Dead are walking again, and zombies are... well not exactly ruling the earth as in Dawn/Day of the Dead, but kind of infesting it. A group of military deserters (actually seen briefly robbing the characters in Diary of the Dead) make for a Massachussets island in hope of a place to ride out the semipocalypse, but once there find an old human feud is more pressing than the zombies are.

Good Bits
The characters often make or break a zombie movies, since they're inevitably human stories with zombie backdrops. In this case the humans fall just on the right side of nondescript. The locals are fairly interesting, if a little cliche, and the military types have a nice relationship among them even if only a couple are particularly likeable. There's a few decent Romero-esque zombie slapstick moments in there too that made me chuckle. The zombies themselves are the good kind too. They're slow, not always sure that they should be eating people, and very stupid. It's the balance between menace, repulsion, and pity that only Romero has ever managed to hit for me.

Bad Bits
There just doesn't seem to be a whole lot of zombie activity. Is this the second zombie apocalypse? The one that hit the handful of survivors of the first one? Because there sure isn't a whole lot of population coming after the survivors and the zombies aren't threatening at all in the small numbers used. It's just not very apocalyptic at all. There's also some pretty poor slapstick to go with the good stuff. It looks like they watched Zombieland and though they'd stick some of their jokes in. Good in Zombieland, bad here. Over the top just doesn't fit the rest of the film. Lastly, he's still plugging away at the smart zombie thing. If there was some form of progression (as seen in Day and Land) then I could accept it as his vision of the dead slowly regaining their function. But he seems to have twisted it in this case to include the question of zombie salvation, and then lost all continuity with his zombie evolution.
Oh, did I say lastly? Not quite, he stuck in an annoying smart-ass teenager who brings nothing to the film. He introduces a money plot element even though it's clearly useless because there's nowhere to spend it, he's got the shooting skills of a gunfighter for no apparent reason, and his smug commentry on technology is embarrassing (he criticises a laptop for being 'a crappy PC', and produces an iPod as a superior computer).

Conclusion
You may have noticed the 'bad' paragraph is larger than the 'good'. In fact, if I'd written a 'meh' paragraph that would have been the biggest. The effects are motly okay, the plot's workable, the pace is fair. But by definition there's not a lot to say about the mundane stuff. Weighing it up I'd say it was worth watching if you're a fan of Romero or Zombie films, unlike Diary, but despite the box claiming it's his best since Dawn of the Dead, it was pretty uninspiring.

Rating
:mrh?: :mrh?: :mrh?: :mrh?: :mrh?: :mrh?: :starempty: :starempty: :starempty: :starempty:
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

I thought this was the worst one yet. Romero seems to have lost it entirely.
Chickenz
Optimus Prime
Optimus Prime
Posts: 1155
Joined: December 8th, 2005, 20:06

Post by Chickenz »

:above:
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

I thought Diary was worse. All the characters were terrible, the plot was pretty poor, and the shakeycam was just a gimmick. At least in Suvival there was the interesting relationship between the girl and the Hispanic bloke.
spoodie
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 9246
Joined: February 6th, 2005, 16:49
Location: Essex, UK

Post by spoodie »

Dog Pants wrote:I thought Diary was worse.
To be fair I disliked them both in fairly equal measure. Survival just seemed like someone thought "lets put zombies in a western-type scenario" and this is the closest they could get in modern day; some Irish idiots fighting over an island for no good reason. Also the zombie rehabilitation idea was done better, and with far more entertainment value, with Bub in Day of the Dead.

Those two characters you mentioned are the best aspect of the film. All the rest seemed half-arsed.
buzzmong
Weighted Storage Cube
Weighted Storage Cube
Posts: 7167
Joined: February 26th, 2007, 17:26
Location: Middle England, nearish Cov

Post by buzzmong »

I may watch this.

I did watch about a quarter of Diary before flicking though it with 30 second gaps until the end. I really thought it was poor after the opening news scenes.
Dog Pants
Site Moderator
Site Moderator
Posts: 21653
Joined: April 29th, 2005, 13:39
Location: Surrey, UK
Contact:

Post by Dog Pants »

spoodie wrote: Survival just seemed like someone thought "lets put zombies in a western-type scenario" and this is the closest they could get in modern day; some Irish idiots fighting over an island for no good reason. Also the zombie rehabilitation idea was done better, and with far more entertainment value, with Bub in Day of the Dead.

Those two characters you mentioned are the best aspect of the film. All the rest seemed half-arsed.
Agreed. Image
buzzmong wrote:I really thought it was poor after the opening news scenes.
I really need to watch [REC]. That looks quite similar to the news style opening.
Post Reply